|
|
OF FREE-WILL,
THE NATURE AND POWER THEREOF.
OUR next task is to
take a view of the idol himself, of this great deity of free-will, whose
original being not well known, he is pretended, like the Ephesian image of
Diana, to have fallen down from heaven, and to have his endowments from above.
But yet, considering what a nothing he was at his first discovery in comparison
of that vast giant-like hugeness to which now he is grown, we may say of him as
the painter said of his monstrous picture, which he had mended or rather marred
according to everyone’s fancy, “Hunc populus fecit,” — it is the issue of the
people’s brain. Origen is supposed to have brought him
first into the church; but among those many sincere worshippers of divine
grace, this setter forth of new demons found but little entertainment. It was
looked upon but like the stump of Dagon, with his head and hands laid down
before the ark of God, without whose help he could neither know nor do that
which is good in any kind, still accounted but “truncus ficulnus, inutile
lignum,” — “a fig-tree log, an unprofitable piece of wood.” “Incerti patres
scamnum facerentne?” The fathers of the succeeding ages had much debate to what
use they should put it, and though some exalted it a degree or two above its
merits, yet the most concluded to keep it a block still; until at length there
arose a stout champion, challenging
on his behalf the whole church of God, and, like a knight-errant, wandered from
the west to the east to grapple with any that should oppose his idol; who,
though he met with divers adversaries, one especially, who in the behalf of the grace of God continually foiled him and
cast him to the ground, and that in the judgment of all the lawful judges
assembled in councils, and in the opinion of most of the Christian bystanders,
yet, by his cunning insinuation, he planted such an opinion of his idol’s deity
and self-sufficiency in the hearts of divers, that to this day it could never
be rooted out.
Now, after the
decease of his Pelagian worshippers, some of the corrupter schoolmen, seeing
him thus from his birth exposed without shelter to wind and weather, to all
assaults, out of mere charity and self-love built him a temple, and adorned it with
natural lights, merits, uncontrolled independent operations, with many other
gay attendances. But in the beginning of the Reformation, — that fatal time for
idolatry and superstition, together with abbeys and monasteries, — the zeal and
learning of our forefathers, with the help of God’s word, demolished this
temple, and brake this building down to the ground; in the rubbish whereof we
well hoped the idol himself had been so deeply buried as that his head should
never more have been exalted, to the trouble of the church of God, until not
long since some curious wits, whose weak stomachs were clogged with manna and
loathed the sincere milk of the word, raking all dunghills for novelties,
lighted unhappily upon this idol, and presently, with no less joy than did the
mathematician at the discovery of a new geometrical proportion, exclaim, “We
have found it! we have found it!” And without more ado, up they erected a
shrine, and until this day continue offering of praise and thanks for all the
good they do to this work of their own hands.
And that the idol may be free from ruin, to which in
himself they have found by experience that he is subject, they have matched him
to contingency, a new goddess of their own creation, who, having proved very
fruitful in monstrous births upon their conjunctions, they nothing doubt they
shall never want one to set on the throne and make president of all human
actions: so that after he hath, with various success, at least twelve hundred
years, contended with the providence and grace of God, he boasteth now as if he
had obtained a total victory. But yet all his prevailing is to be attributed to
the diligence and varnish of his new abettors, with (to our shame be it
spoken!) the negligence of his adversaries. In him and his cause there is no
more real worth than was when by the ancient fathers he was exploded and cursed
out of the church: so that they who can attain, through the many winding
labyrinths of curious distinctions, to look upon the thing itself, shall find
that they have been, like Egyptian novices, brought through many stately
frontispieces and goodly fabrics, with much show of zeal and devotion, to the
image of an ugly ape.
Yet here observe,
that we do not absolutely oppose free-will, as if it were “nomen inane,” a mere
figment, when there is no such thing in the world, but only in that sense the
Pelagians and Arminians do assert it. About words we will not contend. We grant
man, in the substance of all his actions, as much power, liberty, and freedom as a mere created
nature is capable of. We grant him to be free in his choice from all outward
coaction, or inward natural necessity, to work according to election and
deliberation, spontaneously embracing what seemeth good unto him. Now, call
this power free-will, or what you please, so you make it not supreme,
independent, and boundless, we are not at all troubled. The imposition of names
depends upon the discretion of their inventers. Again; even in spiritual
things, we deny that our wills are at all debarred, or deprived of their proper
liberty: but here we say, indeed, that we are not properly free until the Son
makes us free; — no great use of freedom in that wherein we can do nothing at
all. We do not claim such a liberty as should make us despise the grace of God,
whereby we may attain true liberty indeed; which addeth to, but taketh nothing
from, our original freedom. But of this after I have showed what an idol the
Arminians make of free-will. Only take notice in the entrance that we speak of it
now, not as it was at first by God created, but as it is now by sin corrupted;
yet, being considered in that estate also, they ascribe more unto it than it
was ever capable of. As it now standeth, according to my formerly-proposed
method, I shall show, — first, what inbred native virtue they ascribe unto it,
and with how absolute a dominion and sovereignty over all our actions they
endow it; secondly, what power they say it hath in preparing us for the grace
of God; thirdly, how effectually operative it is in receiving the said grace,
and with how little help thereof it accomplisheth the great work of our
conversion; — all briefly, with so many observations as shall suffice to
discover their proud errors in each particular.
“Herein,” saith
Arminius, “consisteth the liberty of the will, that all things required to
enable it to will any thing being accomplished, it still remains indifferent to
will or not.” And all of them at the synod: “There is,” say they, “accompanying
the will of man an inseparable property, which we call liberty, from whence the
will is termed a power, which, when all things pre-required as necessary to
operation are fulfilled, may will anything, or not will it;” that is, our
free-wills have such an absolute and uncontrollable power in the territory of
all human actions, that no influence of God’s providence, no certainty of his
decree, no unchangeableness of his purpose, can sway it at all in its free
determinations, or have any power with his highness to cause him to will or resolve on any such act as
God by him intendeth to produce. Take an instance in the great work of our
conversion. “All unregenerate men,” saith Arminius, “have, by virtue of their
free-will, a power of resisting the Holy Spirit, of rejecting the offered grace
of God, of contemning the counsel of God concerning themselves, of refusing the
gospel of grace, of not opening the heart to him that knocketh.” What a stout
idol is this, whom neither the Holy Spirit, the grace and counsel of God, the
calling of the gospel, the knocking at the door of the heart, can move at all,
or in the least measure prevail against him! Woe be unto us, then, if when God
calls us our free-will be not in good temper, and well disposed to hearken unto
him! for it seems there is no dealing with it by any other ways, though
powerful and almighty. “For grant,” saith Corvinus,
“all the operations of grace which God can use in our conversion, yet
conversion remaineth so in our own free power that we can be not converted;
that is, we can either turn or not turn ourselves;” where the idol plainly
challengeth the Lord to work his utmost, and tells him that after he hath so
done he will do what he please. His infallible prescience, his powerful
predetermination, the moral efficacy of the gospel, the infusion of grace, the
effectual operation of the Holy Spirit, all are nothing, not at all available
in helping or furthering our independent wills in their proceedings. Well,
then, in what estate will you have the idol placed?
“In such a one
wherein he may be suffered to sin, or to do well, at his pleasure,” as the same
author intimates. It seems, then, as to sin, so nothing is required for him to
be able to do good but God’s permission? No! For the Remonstrants (as they
speak of themselves) “do always suppose a free power of obeying or not obeying,
as well in those who do obey as in those who do not obey;” — that he that is
obedient may therefore be counted obedient, because he obeyeth when he could
not obey, and so on the contrary:” where all the praise of our obedience,
whereby we are made to differ from others, is ascribed to ourselves alone, and
that free power that is in us. Now, this they mean not of any one act of
obedience, but of faith itself, and the whole consummation thereof. “For if a
man should say, that every man in the world hath a power of believing if he
will, and of attaining salvation, and that this power is settled in his nature,
what argument have you to confute him?” saith Arminius triumphantly to Perkins;
where the sophistical innovator as plainly confounds grace and nature as ever did Pelagius.
That, then, which the Arminians claim here in behalf of their free-will is, an
absolute independence on God’s providence in doing anything, and of his grace
in doing that which is good, — a self-sufficiency in all its operations, a
plenary indifferency of doing what we will, this or that, as being neither
determined to the one nor inclined to the other by any overruling influence
from heaven. So that the good acts of our wills have no dependence on God’s
providence as they are acts, nor on his grace as they are good; but in both
regards proceed from such a principle within us as is no way moved by any
superior agent. Now, the first of these we deny unto our wills, because they
are created; and the second, because they are corrupted. Their creation hinders
them from doing anything of themselves without the assistance of God’s
providence; and their corruption, from doing anything that is good without his
grace. A self-sufficiency for operation, without the effectual motion of
Almighty God, the first cause of all things, we can allow neither to men nor
angels, unless we intend to make them gods; and a power of doing good, equal
unto that they have of doing evil, we must not grant to man by nature, unless
we will deny the fall of Adam, and fancy ourselves still in paradise. But let
us consider these things apart.
FIRST, I shall not
stand to decipher the nature of human liberty, which perhaps would require a
larger discourse than my proposed method will bear. It may suffice that,
according to my former intimation, we grant as large a freedom and dominion to
our wills over their own acts as a creature, subject to the supreme rule of
God’s providence, is capable of. Endued we are with such a liberty of will as
is free from all outward compulsion and inward necessity, having an elective
faculty of applying itself unto that which seems good unto it, in which it is a
free choice; notwithstanding, it is subservient to the decree of God, as I
showed before, chap. 4. Most free it is in all its acts, both in regard of the
object it chooseth and in regard of that vital power and faculty whereby it
worketh, infallibly complying with God’s providence, and working by virtue of
the motion thereof; but surely to assert such a supreme independency and every
way unbounded indifferency as the Arminians claim, whereby, all other things
requisite being pre-supposed, it should remain absolutely in our own power to
will or not to will, to do anything or not to do it, is plainly to deny that
our wills are subject to the rule of the Most High. It is granted that in such
a chimerical,
fancied consideration of free-will, wherein it is looked upon as having no
relation to any act of God’s but only its creation, abstracting from his decree,
it may be said to have such a liberty in regard of the object; but the truth
is, this divided sense is plain nonsense, a mere fiction of such an estate as
wherein it never was, nor ever can be, so long as men will confess any deity
but themselves, to whose determinations they must be subject. Until, then, more
significant terms may be invented for this free power in our nature, which the
Scripture never once vouchsafed to name, I shall be content to call it with
Prosper, a “spontaneous appetite of what
seemeth good unto it,” free from all compulsion, but subservient to the
providence of God. And against its exaltation to this height of independency, I
oppose, —
First, Everything that is independent of any else in
operation is purely active, and so consequently a god; for nothing but a divine
will can be a pure act, possessing such a liberty by virtue of its own essence.
Every created will must have a liberty by participation, which includeth such
an imperfect potentiality as cannot be brought into act without some premotion
(as I may so say) of a superior agent. Neither doth this motion, being
extrinsical, at all prejudice the true liberty of the will, which requireth,
indeed, that the internal principle of operation be active and free, but not
that that principle be not moved to that operation by an outward superior
agent. Nothing in this sense can have an independent principle of operation
which hath not an independent being. It is no more necessary to the nature of a
free cause, from whence a free action must proceed, that it be the first
beginning of it, than it is necessary to the nature of a cause that it be the
first cause.
Secondly, If the
free acts of our wills are so subservient to the providence of God as that he
useth them to what end he will, and by them effecteth many of his purposes,
then they cannot of themselves be so absolutely independent as to have in their
own power every necessary circumstance and condition, that they may use or not
use at their pleasure. Now, the former is proved by all those reasons and texts
of Scripture I before produced to show that the providence of God overruleth
the actions and determineth the wills of men freely to do that which he hath
appointed. And, truly, were it otherwise, God’s dominion over the most things
that are in the world were quite excluded; he had not power to determine that any one thing should ever come
to pass which hath any reference to the wills of men.
Thirdly, All the acts of the will being positive
entities, were it not previously moved by God himself, “in whom we live, move,
and have our being,” must needs have their essence and existence solely from
the will with an underived being. And so much to that particular.
Let us now, in the SECOND place, look upon the power of
our freewill in doing that which is morally good; where we shall find not only
an essential imperfection, inasmuch as it is created, but also a contracted
effect, inasmuch as it is corrupted. The ability which the Arminians ascribe
unto it in this kind, of doing that which is morally and spiritually good, is
as large as themselves will confess to be competent unto it in the state of
innocency, even a power of believing and a power of resisting the gospel, of
obeying and not obeying, of turning or of not being converted.
The Scripture, as I observed before, hath no such term at
all, nor anything equivalent unto it. But the expressions it useth concerning
our nature and all the faculties thereof, in this state of sin and
unregeneration, seem to imply the quite contrary; as, that we are in “bondage,”
Hebrews 2:15; “dead in sins,” Ephesians 2:1, and so “free from righteousness,”
Romans 6:20; “servants of sin,” verse 17; under the “reign” and “dominion”
thereof, verses 12, 14; all “our members being instruments of unrighteousness,”
verse 13; not “free indeed,” until “the Son make us free.” So that this idol of
free-will, in respect of spiritual things, is not one whit better than the
other idols of the heathen. Though it look like “silver and gold,” it is the
“work of men’s hands.”
“It hath a mouth,
but it speaketh not; it hath eyes, but it seeth not; it hath ears, but it
heareth not; a nose, but it smelleth not; it hath hands, but it handleth not;
feet, but it walketh not; neither speaketh it through its throat. They that
made it are like unto it; and so is every one that trusteth in it. O Israel,
trust thou in the LORD,” etc., Psalm 115:4-9.
That it is the work
of men’s hands, or a human invention, I showed before. For the rest, it hath a
mouth unacquainted with the “mystery of godliness,” “full only of cursing and bitterness,”
Romans 3:14; “speaking great swelling words,” Jude 16; “great things, and
blasphemies,” Revelation 13:5; a “mouth causing the flesh to sin,” Ecclesiastes
5:6; — his eyes are blind, not able to perceive those things that are of God,
nor to know those things that are “spiritually discerned,” 1 Corinthians 2:14;
“eyes before which there is no fear of God,” Romans 3:18; — his “understanding
is darkened, because of the blindness of his heart,” Ephesians 4:18; “wise to
do evil, but to do good he hath no knowledge,” Jeremiah 4:22; so that without
farther light, all the world is but a mere “darkness,” John 1:5; — he hath
ears, but they are like the ears of the “deaf adder” to the word of God,
“refusing to hear the voice of charmers, charming never so wisely,” Psalm 58:5;
being “dead” when his voice first calls it, John 5:25; “ears stopped that they
should not hear,” Zechariah 7:11; “heavy ears” that cannot hear, Isaiah 6:10; —
a nose, to which the gospel is “the savor of death unto death,” 2 Corinthians
2:16; — “ hands full of blood,” Isaiah 1:15; and “fingers defiled with
iniquity,” chap. 59:3; — feet, indeed, but, like Mephibosheth, lame in both by
a fall, so that he cannot at all walk in the path of goodness; but
“swift to shed
blood, destruction and misery are in his ways, and the way of peace hath he not
known,” Romans 3:15-17.
These, and divers other such endowments and excellent
qualifications, doth the Scripture attribute to this idol, which it calls “The
old man,” as I shall more fully discover in the next chapter. And is not this a
goodly reed whereon to rely in the paths of godliness? a powerful deity
whereunto we may repair for a power to become the sons of God, and attain
eternal happiness? The abilities of free-will in particular I shall consider
hereafter; now only I will, by one or two reasons, show that it cannot be the
sole and proper cause of any truly good and spiritual act, well-pleasing unto
God.
First, All spiritual
acts well-pleasing unto God, as faith, repentance, obedience, are supernatural;
flesh and blood revealeth not these things:
“Not of blood, nor
of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man; but of God,” John 1:13;
“That which is
born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit,”
John 3:6.
Now, to the
performance of any supernatural act it is required that the productive power
thereof be also supernatural; for nothing hath an activity in causing above its
own sphere. “Nec imbelles generant feroces aquilas columbae.” But our free-will
is a merely natural faculty, betwixt which and those spiritual, supernatural
acts there is no proportion, unless it be advanced above its own orb, by inherent,
habitual grace. Divine, theological virtues, differing even in the substance of
the act from those moral performances about the same things to which the
strength of nature may reach (for the difference of acts ariseth from their
formal objects, which to both these are diverse), must have another principle
and cause above all the power of nature in civil things and actions morally
good, inasmuch as they are subject to a natural perception, and do not exceed
the strength of our own wills. This faculty of free-will may take place, but
yet not without these following limitations: —First, That it always
requireth the general concurrence of God, whereby the whole suppositum in
which free-will hath its subsistence may be sustained, Matthew 10:29, 30. Secondly,
That we do all these things imperfectly and with much infirmity; every
degree, also, of excellency in these things must be counted a special gift of
God, Isaiah 26:12. Thirdly, That our wills are determined by the will of
God to all their acts and motions in particular; but to do that which is
spiritually good we have no knowledge, no power.
Secondly, That
concerning which I gave one special instance, in whose production the Arminians
attribute much to free-will, is faith. This they affirm (as I showed before) to
be inbred in nature, everyone having in him from his birth a natural power to
believe in Christ and his gospel; for Episcopius denies that “any action of the
Holy Spirit upon the understanding or will is necessary, or promised in the
Scripture, to make a man able to believe the word preached unto him.” So that
it seems every man hath at all times a power to believe, to produce the act of
faith upon the revelation of its object: which gross Pelagianism is contrary, —
First, To the doctrine of the church of
England, alarming that a man cannot so much as prepare himself by his own
strength to faith and calling upon God, until the grace of God by Christ prevent him, that he may
have a good will. — Artic. 10.
Secondly, To the Scripture, teaching that
it is “the work of God that we do believe,” John 6:29. It is “not of ourselves;
it is the gift of God,” Ephesians 2:8. To some “it is given to know the
mysteries of the kingdom of heaven,” Matthew 13:11. And what is peculiarly
given to some cannot be in the power of everyone: “To you it is given in the
behalf of Christ to believe on him,” Philippians 1:29. Faith is our access or
coming unto Christ; which none can do “except the Father draw him,” John 6:44;
and he so draweth, or “hath mercy, on whom he will have mercy,” Romans 9:18.
And although Episcopius rejects any immediate action of the Holy Spirit for the
ingenerating of faith, yet St. Paul affirmeth that there is no less effectual
power required to it than that which raised Christ from the dead; which, sure,
was an action of the almighty Godhead. “That ye may know,” saith he, “what is
the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the
working of his mighty power, which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him
from the dead,” Ephesians 1:18-20. So that, let the Arminians say what they
please, recalling that I write to Christians, I will spare my labor of farther
proving that faith is the free gift of God; and their opposition to the truth
of the Scripture in this particular is so evident to the meanest capacity that
there needs no recapitulation to present the sum of it to their understandings.