|
|
CHAPTER 2
OF
THE NATURE OF AN END IN GENERAL, AND SOME DISTINCTIONS ABOUT IT.
I. The end of anything is that which the agent intendeth to
accomplish in and by the operation which is proper unto its nature, and which
it applieth itself unto, — that which any one aimeth at, and designeth in
himself to attain, as a thing good and desirable unto him in the state and
condition wherein he is. So the end which Noah proposed unto himself in the
building of the ark was the preservation of himself and others. According to
the will of God, he made an ark to preserve himself and his family from the
flood: “According to all that God commanded him, so did he,” Genesis 6:22. That
which the agent doth, or whereto he applieth himself, for the compassing his
proposed end, is called the means; which two do complete the whole reason of
working in free intellectual agents, for I speak only of such as work according
to choice or election. So Absalom intending a revolt from his father, to
procure the crown and kingdom for himself, “he prepared him horses and
chariots, and fifty men to run before him,” 2 Samuel 15:1; and farther, by fair
words, and glossing compliances, “he stole the hearts of the men of Israel” 2
Samuel 15:6; then pretends a sacrifice at Hebron, where he makes a strong
conspiracy, 2 Samuel 15:12, — all which were the means he used for the attaining of his fore-proposed end.
II.
Between both these, end and
means, there is this relation, that (though in sundry
kinds) they are mutually causes one of another. The end is the first,
principal, moving cause of the whole. It is that for whose sake the whole work
is. No agent applies itself to action but for an end; and were it not by that
determined to some certain effect, thing, way, or manner of working, it would
no more do one thing than another. The inhabitants of the old world desiring
and intending unity and cohabitation, with perhaps some reserves to provide for
their safety against a second storm, they cry,
“Go to, let us
build us a city, and a tower whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make
us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth,”
Genesis 9:4.
First, They lay down
their aim and design, and then let out the means in their apprehension
conducing thereunto. And manifest, then, it is, that the whole reason and
method of affairs that a wise worker or agent, according to the counsel,
proposeth to himself is taken from the end which he aims at; that is, in
intention and contrivance, the beginning of all that order which is in working.
Now, the means are all those things which are used for the attaining of the end
proposed, — as meat for the preservation of life, sailing in a ship for him
that would pass the sea, laws for the quiet continuance of human society; and
they are the procuring cause of the end, in one kind or another. Their
existence is for the ends sake, and the end hath its rise out of them,
following them either morally as their desert, or naturally as their fruit and
product. First, In a moral sense. When the action and the end are to be
measured or considered in reference to a moral rule, or law prescribed to the
agent, then the means are the deserving or meritorious cause of the end; as, if
Adam had continued in his innocency, and done all things according to the law
given unto him, the end procured thereby had been a blessed life to eternity;
as now the end of any sinful act is death, the curse of the law. Secondly, When
the means are considered only in their natural relation, then they are the
instrumentally efficient cause of the end. So Joab intending the death of
Abner, “he smote him with his spear under the fifth rib, that he died,” 2
Samuel 3:27. And when Benaiah, by the command of Solomon, fell upon Shimei the
wounds he gave him were the efficient of his death, 1 Kings 2:46. In which
regard there is no difference between the murdering of an innocent man and the
executing of an offender; but as they are under a moral consideration, their
ends follow their deservings, in respect of conformity to the rule, and so
there is ca>sma me>ga between them.
III. The former consideration, by reason of the defect and perverseness
of some agents (for otherwise these things are coincident), holds out a twofold
end of things, — first, of the work, and, secondly, of the workman; of the act
and the agent: for when the means assigned for the attaining of any end are not
proportioned unto it, nor, fitted for it, according to that rule which the
agent is to work by, then it cannot be but that he must aim at one thing and
another follow, in respect of the morality of the work. So Adam is enticed into
a desire to be like God; this now he makes his aim, which: to effect he eats
the forbidden fruit, and that contracts a guilt which he aimed not at. But when
the agent acts aright, and as it should do, — when it aims at an end that is
proper to it, belonging to its proper perfection and condition, and worketh by
such means as are fit and suitable to the end proposed, — the end of the work
and the workman are one and the same; as when Abel intended the worship of the
Lord, he offered a sacrifice through faith, acceptable unto him; or as a man,
desiring salvation through Christ, applieth himself to get an interest in him.
Now, the sole reason of this diversity is, that secondary agents, such as men
are, have an end set and appointed to their actions by Him which giveth them an
external rule or law to work by, which shall always attend them in their
working, whether they will or no. God only, whose will and good pleasure is the
sole rule of all those works which outwardly are of him, can never deviate in
his actions, nor have any end attend or follow his acts not precisely by him
intended.
IV.
Again; the end of every
free agent is either that which he effecteth, or that for whose sake he doth
effect it. When a builds a house to let to hire, that which he effecteth is the
building of a house; that which moveth him to do it is love of gain. The
physician cures the patient, and is moved to it by his reward. The end which
Judas aimed at in his going to the priests, bargaining with them, conducting
the soldiers to the garden, kissing Christ, was the betraying of his Master;
but the end for whose sake the whole undertaking was set on foot was the obtaining
of the thirty pieces of silver: “What will ye give me, and I will do it?” The
end which God effected by the death of Christ was the satisfaction of his
justice: the end for whose sake he did it was either supreme, or his own glory;
or subordinate, ours with him.
V. Moreover, the
means are of two sorts: — First, Such as have a true goodness in themselves
without reference to any farther kind; though not so considered as we use them
for means. No means, as a means is considered as good in itself, but only as
conducible to a farther end; it is repugnant to the nature of means, as such,
to be considered as good in themselves. Study is in itself the most noble
employment of the soul; but, aiming at wisdom or knowledge, we consider it as
good only inasmuch as it conducteth to that end, otherwise as “a weariness of
the flesh,” Ecclesiasties 12:12. Secondly, Such as have no good at all in any
kind, as in themselves considered, but merely as conducing to that end which
they are fit to attain. They receive all their goodness (which is but relative)
from that whereunto they are appointed, in themselves no way desirable; as the
cutting off a leg or an arm for the preservation of life, taking a bitter
potion for health’s sake, throwing corn and lading into the sea to prevent
shipwreck. Of which nature is the death of Christ, as we shall afterward
declare.
VI.
These things being thus proposed in general, our next task must
be to accommodate them to the present business in hand; which we shall do in
order, by laying down the agent working, the means wrought and the end
effected, in the great work of our redemption; for these three must be orderly
considered and distinctly, that we may have a right apprehension of the whole:
into the first whereof, sun theo, we make an entrance in [chapter third.]